It’s
soccer-friendly season again in the U.S., a time when teams from England,
Italy, Spain, and France play MLS teams and each other during what is in effect
the non-American sides’ pre-seasons. It’s a little like those old
mixed-“universe” comics from the 70s, joint Marvel/D.C. efforts that saw Spiderman
or the Fantastic Four “teaming up” with Superman or Batman. They're not serious, not for
the purist, but somehow for most of us they’re intriguing. I saw Liverpool play AS Roma a couple of days ago in Fenway Park, for example, and I thought the game
had an appealing mix of hard and fair play. That is, the match didn’t have the
air of a mere exhibition, with lazy play and smiling, backslapping opponents.
And at the same time, it lacked flopping and other tedious gamesmanship (like
time-wasting) that often mar competitive soccer matches.
I
went into that match interested in Liverpool’s new, young coach, who evidently
wants to play a more attractive and attacking kind of soccer. I hoped perhaps to find an English Premiership team to which I might affix my
European-directed loyalties (which are now entirely with FC Barcelona). As it
happened, I found myself at Fenway seated near an annoying Liverpool fan, the
kind of follower (in at least two senses of that word) who feels that all fouls
or potential fouls committed by players against “his” team are red-cardable
offenses, and all fouls committed by “his” team’s players are egregious
miscarriages of justice. As a result of his obnoxious bellyaching, and the fact
that U.S. international Michael Bradley is now playing for Roma, I quickly
glommed onto the Italian side. To my mild satisfaction, Roma won 2-1. They
deserved the victory, too. Liverpool, down 2-0, pulled one back in the 80th
minute, but the game failed to open up after that as I expected. Roma took it
by the throat, thanks in part to Bradley’s hard-nosed work in midfield. (Bradley
also scored the game’s first goal, by the way, a second-half strike that hit
the far post and caromed into the net.)
To
my mind, the most intriguing U.S. summer friendly is the annual MLS all-star
game, which for some years now has pitted the MLS all-stars against a
top-flight team, usually from the EPL, though a few years ago the all-stars
played Celtic. This year’s game involved current Champions League winners
Chelsea and took place in Philadelphia, shortly after the Liverpool v. Roma
game on Wednesday night. A friend of mine emailed me yesterday saying he didn’t
know what, if anything, to take away from the match, a 3-2 MLS all-star win.
Indeed, many qualifications must be placed on such a match, all of which have
been cited before. The MLS players are in midseason form and fitness, the
European sides working to get in shape and knock off technical rust. The
European teams’ players have mostly trained and played together before, whereas
the MLS players are thrown together and have to figure out each others'
tendencies over the course of a single exhibition game that sees numerous
substitutions on both sides. There is really nothing to play for other than
professional pride. Et cetera.
There
are other points to be made against reading anything into MLS all-star games.
And yet, I think you can draw some conclusions from Wednesday’s match,
especially when you think about it in the context of previous all-star games.
After years of performing well against mid-table EPL teams like Everton, and
against Celtic, the MLS all-stars were indisputably outclassed in 2010 and
2011, getting drubbed by Manchester United both years. Man U’s quality and
depth are of course matched by only a few soccer clubs in the world, and that
fact was made clear against the all-stars, whether or not Man U players were in
mid-season form and whether or not they were regular starters.
I
was happy when MLS announced that this year’s game was against Chelsea. That
club is somewhere between Everton and Manchester United on the quality
spectrum—a more realistic standard for comparison than Manchester United but
still a highly ambitious club with a well compensated roster. I became even
more pleased with the choice while watching some of this year’s Champions
League matches involving Chelsea. I grew to hate the club during that time.
Their near-total lack of creative attacking players forced them to sit back and
rely on an organized defense while hoping to score off a rare counter or set
piece. Watching those Champions League games involving Chelsea put me in mind
of being chained in a bathroom and forced to watch a person grapple with
constipation. The fact that some fans and critics preferred Chelsea to
Barcelona and Bayern Munich perplexed and almost enraged me, the kind of
feeling I get when people support a certain kind of politician over another who
seems to me to be the logical choice.
Wednesday’s
MLS all-star game was evidence—perhaps a small bit of evidence, but still
evidence—that this iteration of Chelsea is a team whose true nature was
revealed in the Champions League. They’re uncreative and don’t know what to do
with themselves if they can’t defend and counter against a better team. Their deficiencies
were on display in the final minutes of the all-star game. With the MLS
all-stars up 3-2, Dwayne De Rosario gave the ball away at midfield and exposed
the MLS back line. The Chelsea right winger (I didn’t catch who it was) had
virtually the entire final third at his disposal when he got the ball at his
feet. Did he attack and shoot? No, he turned the ball back towards midfield. Man U would have promptly punished MLS for De Rosario’s
giveaway, but in the event Chelsea didn’t even get a shot off. It may be cause
for concern for Chelsea that the two goals they did score in this game came not
from young players like Romelu Lukaku, but from old-timers Frank Lampard and John
Terry. Both goals were, of course, scored off balls whipped into the box, one
off a set piece.
To
add to that, the MLS players looked comfortable on the ball, knocking it around
with composure even in their own third. That’s in contrast to the 2010 and 2011
all-star games, when the MLS players rarely showed composure, in fact were
mercilessly and efficiently cut up and run off the field. In short, the 2012
MLS all-star game will lead many of us to conclude that Chelsea is not nearly
as good as Manchester United and that MLS has enough quality players to field a
team (relative to the Blues, a very, very cheap team) that can at the least compete
with Chelsea.